¹National Institute for Coastal and Marine Management/RIKZ, P.O. Box 20907, 2500 EX The Hague, The Netherlands
²AquaSense Consultants, P.O. Box 95125, 1090 HC Amsterdam, The Netherlands
³Euras, Maaltecenter Derbystraat 361, 9051 Ghent, Belgium
⁴Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research/TNO, P.O. Box 57,1780 AB Den Helder, The Netherlands

^*Corresponding author

Abstract

  Four laboratories were compared to ascertain the reproducibility of test methods for five bioassays: the ten day whole sediment bioassay with the amphipod Corophium volutator, the fourteen day whole sediment bioassay with adult sea urchins Echinocardium cordatum, the Microtox solid phase bioassay with the bacterium Vibrio fischeri, the oyster larvae sediment elutriate bioassay using Crassostrea gigas and the sediment pore water bioassay with the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. The bioassays were all conducted according to the standard operating procedures of the National Institute for Coastal and Marine Management/RIKZ and carried out with one control sediment and three moderately contaminated dredged materials from the Netherlands. Reference toxicant tests were also performed for every bioassay, to assess the condition of the test species. Reproducibility and inter-laboratory variability were evaluated by calculating coefficients of variation for the sediment bioassays and considering the ability of each laboratory to achieve the test acceptability criteria and to identify a number of confounding factors.
The bioassays involving the amphipods and sea urchins had an acceptable inter-laboratory variability, with average coefficients of variation of 20% or less. The Microtox solid phase bioassay showed high reproducibility and the least variability among laboratories, with average coefficients of variation of 12%. In contrast, the results for percent net response in the oyster larvae bioassay were very variable and poorly reproducible: in three of the four sediments the coefficients of variation exceeded 100%. Two laboratories did not meet the test acceptability criterion for oyster embryo development in the control sediment. Survival in the rotifer bioassay also varied greatly among laboratories with average coefficients of variation of 48%. We conclude that the main sources of inter-laboratory variability were 1) individual differences in the skill and experience of laboratory technicians (for the amphipod, oyster larvae and rotifer bioassays); 2) the use of different batches of test organisms (sea urchin bioassay) and 3) the use of different dilution water (oyster larvae bioassay).