| |
|
Fish Habitat Science and Management in Finnish Freshwaters
Juha Jurvelius, Heikki Auvinen
Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Saimaa Fisheries
Research and Aquaculture, FIN-581 75 Enonkoski, Finland
Corresponding author: E-mail: heikki.auvinen@
rktl.fi
|
Abstract
The area of Finnish inland waters is 33,500 km2.
Forty fish species, eleven of them indigenous, have been encountered
in the area. The annual catch from inland fisheries is around 40,000
metric tons. The largest changes in fish habitats in Finnish inland
waters have been caused by hydropower construction and timber-floating
in rivers, and eutrophication and water level regulation in lakes.
River-spawning fish species have lost their spawning habitats or
access to spawning sites. In many lakes, eutrophication together
with selective gill-net fishing has shifted the fish assemblages
towards dominance by cyprinids and other small-sized plankton feeders.
Acid precipitation has affected fish stocks in ca. 1% of the 56,000
lakes. Acidification has decreased during the past decade. The management
and use of water resources is regulated by the Water Act. To meet
the requirements of the Act, e.g., in water construction works the
use of the best available techniques (BAT) is required. Enhancement
of fish habitats and natural reproduction is gaining importance
in fisheries management instead of or together with <stocking
of young fish. Timber-floating has ceased in streams and rivers,
and rehabilitation programs for fishery purposes have been carried
out. Habitat-hydraulic models have been used to guide rehabilitation
programs in rivers to meet the needs of juvenile salmonids. In lakes,
eutrophication from point sources have been reduced. Reduction of
non-point loads is now in the focus. Modelling of interactions in
fish community, fishing and stocking has given promising results
in fisheries management. Water level regulation practices that take
into account the survival of fish eggs and larvae are considered
in large reservoirs and lakes. In the future, the dynamics of ecosystems
should be given more emphasis to mitigate the combined effects of
anthropogenic influences on fish habitats and communities.
Keywords: spawning areas, biomanipulation, rehabilitation, legislative
treatment
|