SOCIETY INFO
CONFERENCES
JOURNAL
ECOVISION BOOKS
SEARCH
CONTACT
MEMBERSHIP
HOME
  Journal > Table of Contents > Volume 4 Issue 4 > Abstract
 


Freshwater Fish Habitat Science and Management in India

S. K. Ghosh1, A. G. Ponniah2*

1Technical Services Department (Fisheries), National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), R. 0.,
Calcutta, 6, Royd Street, P B. 9083, Calcuttta-700016, India
2National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Canal Ring Road, P.0. Dilkusha,
Lucknow-226001, India
*Present address: ICLARM, P.O. Box 10670, Penang, Malaysia

Abstract

  India is a land of diverse topography, climate and natural resource. There are 12 major rivers and 48 lesser rivers with a total catchment area of 277.6 million hectares. The fresh water resources of the country, which are varied, harbor 587 species of finfish and account for 9.3 percent of global inland fish production. India's natural capital of h habitat resource has been eroded as reflected in loss of bin-diversity and reduced fish landings. Studies on ecology, environment, and fisheries of five major river systems, in addition to reservoirs and flood plain lake fisheries, have been conducted with greater focus on water quality and less on physical habitat parameters.
  The Central Water Commission is responsible for development of all freshwater bodies, whereas the National River Conservation Directorate is responsible for river conservation. River conservation programs cover major rivers in ten States of the country, the 'Ganga Action Plan' being the most important. These projects target improvement in water quality and not fish habitat improvement. Lack of concern for fish habitat is reflected in the planning of Farakka barrage on the river Ganga (The Ganges) and its impact on 'Hilsa' run. Environmental laws have not achieved desired objectives for lack of enforcement mechanisms. Fishery scientists and resource users not involved in the river conservation program.
  The fresh water habitat management situation in India evokes both concern and hope. Concern arises out of missing elements in the existing fish habitat research, planning and management of resource. The hope for the ire is our increasing awareness of the need for better resource management and environmental conservation. India has a responsibility to conserve these natural assets for future generations. Potential steps are outlined.

Keywords: Ganges, Hilsa, Biodiversity, Conservation, Floodplain

 

Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management: 4(4); 367-380
 

| SOCIETY INFO | CONFERENCES| JOURNAL | ECOVISION BOOKS |

| SEARCH | CONTACT | MEMBERSHIP | HOME |