| |
|
Condition index and growth rates of field caged Corbicula
fluminea (Bivalvia) as biomarkers of pollution gradients in
the Paraná river delta (Argentina)
Daniel H. Cataldoa,b,c*,
Demetrio Boltovskoya,b,c,
Jorge Stripeikisd,
Mónica Posea
aDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas,
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos
Aires, C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentina;
bConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y
Técnicas;
cMuseo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"
dDepartamento de Química Inorgánica, Facultad
de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires,
C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentina
* Corresponding author (daniel@bg.fcen.uba.ar; FAX: 054-11-4576-3384)
|
Abstracts
In 1995-1996, Corbicula fluminea was collected at monthly
intervals at two sites in the delta of the lower Paraná river
(Argentina), at the confluence of the San Antonio and Vinculación
rivers, and from the Paraná de las Palmas river close to
its outlet into the Río de la Plata estuary. The San Antonio
site is located in the vicinity of sources of industrial and sewage
effluents, whereas the more remote Paraná de las Palmas river
sampling location is considerably less polluted. Growth rates of
caged individuals at the two sites also monitored during the same
period, and Cu, Cd, Pb and Zn were measured monthly in the water
and in tissue of animals. Throughout the year concentrations of
all metals in water, as well as Pb and Zn in tissue, varied irregularly
and their levels at the two sites were roughly similar; on the other
hand, Cu and Cd in tissue of animals from the polluted site were
consistently and significantly higher than in those from the remote
site. Changes in the size-frequency of clams from Paraná
de las Palmas river throughout the period surveyed clearly indicated
a highly structured population with a single well defined reproduction
period in October-November. In contrast, shell lengths at San Antonio
changed very little throughout the 13 month period, with over 88%
of the clams varying between 18 and 20 mm in length; no discernible
cohorts were recorded. Growth rates of caged clams were very significantly
lower at the polluted site, with the remote site latter yielding
comparable values to those obtained from the remote site cohort
analysis data. Highest growth rates (around 10 mm) were attained
by the smallest (about 7-8 mm) clams reared in Paraná de
las Palmas river waters, whereas 23 to 25 mm organisms maintained
in San Antonio waters grew only 2 to 3 mm in the same period. Of
the 57 animals which survived throughout the caging experiment,
those below 10 mm at the outset increased, on average, 8.2 mm in
length after 13 months, whereas clams less than10 mm in length grew
only 4.2 mm. The condition index (i.e., dry tissue weight divided
by shell length) of clams from San Antonio was consistently about
50% lower than that of clams from the Paraná de las Palmas
river. It is concluded that delayed growth, poorer condition index,
and the abnormal population structure at San Antonio are due to
enhanced pollution in this area as compared with the Paraná
de las Palmas river, and that all three traits constitute a more
useful biomarker of environmental stress than chemical analyses
of contaminants.
Keywords: pollution, freshwater
|