| |
|
A test of vegetation-related indicators of wetland quality
in the prairie pothole region
Harold A. Kantrud & Wesley E. Newton
National Biological Service, Northern Prairie Science Center,
8711 37th St. SE,
Jamestown, North Dakota 58401-7317, USA
Received 1 November 1995: accepted
in revised form 30 April 1996
|
Abstract
This study was part of an effort by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency to quantitatively assess the environmental quality
or "health" of wetland resources on regional and national
scales. During a two-year pilot study, we tested selected indicators
of wetland quality in the U.S. portion of the prairie pothole region
(PPR). We assumed that the amount of cropland versus non-cropland
(mostly grassland) in the plots containing these basins was a proxy
for their quality. We then tested indicators by their ability to
discriminate between wetlands at the extremes of that proxy. Amounts
of standing dead vegetation were greater in zones of greater water
permanence. Depth of litter was greater in zones of greater water
permanence and in zones of basins in poor-quality watersheds. Amounts
of unvegetated bottom were greater in basins in poor-quality watersheds;
lesser amounts occurred in all wetlands during a wetter year. Greater
amounts of open water occurred during a wetter year and in zones
of greater water permanence. When unadjusted for areas (ha) of communities,
plant taxon richness was higher in wet-meadow and shallow-marsh
zones in good-quality watersheds than in similar zones in poor-quality
watersheds. Wet-meadow zones in good-quality watersheds had greater
numbers of native perennials than those in poor-quality watersheds.
This relation held when we eliminated all communities in good-quality
watersheds larger than the largest communities in poor-quality watersheds
from the data set. We conclude that although amounts of unvegetated
bottom and plant taxon richness in wet-meadow zones were useful
indicators of wetland quality during our study, the search for additional
such indicators should continue. The value of these indicators may
change with the notoriously unstable hydrological conditions in
the PPR. Most valuable would be indicators that could be photographed
or otherwise remotely sensed and would remain relatively stable
under various hydrological conditions. An ideal set of indicators
could detect the absence of stressors, as value to major groups
of organisms.
Keywords: cropland, indicators, prairie wetland, species
richness, wetland quality, wetland zonation
|