| |
|
Sediment quality assessment in the delta of rivers Rhine and
Meuse based on field observations, bioassays and food chain
implications
P. J. den Besten1,
C. A. Schmidt1, M. Ohm2,
M. M. Ruys2, J. W. van Berghem2
&
C. van de Guchte1
Study group for research on biotic effects caused by sediment
pollution,
1Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water
Treatment (RIZA), Ministry of Transport, Public Works and
Water Management, P.O. Box 17,
8200 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands
2Department of Zuid-Hlolland,
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management,
P0. Box 556, 3000 AN Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Received 21 November 1994; accepted in revised
form 22 September 1995
|
Abstract
The quality of sediment was assessed in 46 sites in
the delta of the rivers Rhine and Meuse (The Netherlands) by means
of physical-chemical analysis, field observations on the macrobenthic
community structure, accumulation studies and bioassays using Chironomus
riparius, Daphnia magna and Photobacterium phosphoreum.
The results of chemical analyses were classified using national
criteria for sediment quality. Results of field studies and bioassays
were classified using criteria derived from research in reference
areas or based on data from literature. Risk assessment was carried
out according to the sediment quality triad and by means of multi
criteria analysis (MCA). The Triad approach was used to demonstrate
causal relations between effects on the macrozoobenthos community
structure, effects demonstrated in bioassays and sediment pollution.
This was done by making a comparison of sediment contamination levels
with toxicity data from literature for the test organisms of the
bioassays. Using the MCA method, for each site a numerical value
was derived for total environmental risk in the present situation,
based on observed effects. In this way, a relative risk ranking
of all sites was realized. The MCA values for the present situation
were also compared with MCA scores based on estimated risks after
remediation in 1995, in order to set priorities for sites where
remediation is expected to cause a significant reduction in environmental
risk. In most of the 46 sites studied so far, the macrofauna community
was poorly developed, judged by a low number of benthic species,
low abundances and a high dominance of species regarded as relatively
tolerant to chemical pollution. In bioassays high sediment toxicity
was demonstrated for 24 sites. Using the sediment quality triad
approach, 25 sites were identified as areas where pollution can
be held responsible for the effects observed in the field. From
a comparison of contaminant concentrations in different types of
food with maximum tolerable risk levels, and the application of
a bioaccumulation model it was concluded that the sediment pollution
also implies high risks for plant-, benthos- or fish-eating birds
(secondary poisoning of top predators). In the Nieuwe Merwede highest
MCA risk scores were found for shallow parts where highly polluted
sediments are found. It is concluded that the sediment quality triad
and the MCA provide additional information which can be used to
establish priorities for remedial action. Based on an ecotoxicological
evaluation of the improved quality of new sediments that will be
deposited after removal of the polluted sediments in the Nieuwe
Merwede, it is concluded that in this upstream part of the Rhine
delta remedial action will be effective.
Keywords: sediment pollution, macrozoobenthos, bioassays,
accumulation, sediment quality triad, risk assessment
|