| |
|
Sorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants and trace metals
on phytoplankton and implications for toxicity assessment
G-Yull Rhee & Patsy-Ann Thompson
Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, and School
of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany,
New York State Department of Health, Empire State Plaza, Albany,
New York 12201, USA
|
Abstract
The partitioning of trace metals and hydrophobic organic
contaminants to phytoplankton determines their toxicity as well
as their fate and transport in aquatic ecosystems. Accurate impact
assessments, therefore, depend on a good understanding of the factors
regulating the sorption of these compounds to biotic particles.
The accumulation of chlorinated organic compounds in phytoplankton
is generally considered as being due solely to physical sorption,
described by reversible equilibrium models based on Langmuir or
Freundlich isotherms. On the other hand, the uptake of trace metals
is a two phase process: a fast sorption component viewed as an 'on-
exchange or a covalent bonding process with cell surface ligands,
followed by an intracellular transport phase that is dependent on
cellular metabolic activity. The uptake of inorganic and hydrophobic
organic pollutants and their bioaccumulation are influenced in a
complex manner by duration of exposure and cell density, by environmental
factors such as pH, the concentration of cations and of dissolved
and colloidal organic matter, as well as by phytoplankton physiological
condition. High concentrations of H+, Ca2+,
and Mg2+ ions will reduce trace
metal sorption by directly competing for uptake sites on the cell's
surface, whereas the presence of dissolved organic carbon such as
natural and synthetic chelators and phytoplankton exudates will
reduce the bioavailability of both trace metals and hydrophobic
organic contaminants. Thus, the impact of toxic contaminants on
phytoplankton may he determined as much by the factors influencing
uptake and partitioning as by the potency of the toxicants and interspecies
differences in sensitivity. Recommendations for improving toxicity
assessments are presented.
Keywords: sorption kinetics; hydrophobic organic contaminants;
trace metals; toxicity assessment
|