| |
|
Soft sediment as a constraint on the spread
of the zebra mussel in western Lake Erie: Processes and impacts
John P. Coakley,1*
N. Rasul,2 S. E. Ioannou,3
and G. R. Brown4
1National
Water Research Institute, Burlington, Canada
2Department of Marine Geology
Faculty of Marine Science, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3Departnzent of Geology,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
4Lassonde Mineral Engineering
Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada *Corresponding
author: National Water Research Institute, 867 Lakeshore Road,
Burlington, Canada LVR 4A6; E-mail:nor-word@sympatico.ca
|
Abstract
The zebra mussel (Dreissena), inadvertently
introduced to the Great Lakes in 1986, has since expanded to cover
most of the shallow-water; hard substrates in Lakes Erie and Ontario.
Colony densities exceed 300,000 per m2 in some bedrock areas of
western Lake Erie. The objective of this study was to investigate
the spread of zebra mussel onto soft sediment areas of the western
basin of Lake Erie and to identify natural controls on the large-scale
colonization of such sediments. Combined side scan sonar; underwater
video imagery and direct diver observation showed three modes of
viable zebra mussel colonies in soft substrates: 1) attachment to
zebra mussel shell debris deposited in linear troughs (stripes);
2) attachment to shells built up over hard substrates intermittently
covered by soft sediments (footballs); and 3) as isolated clumps
(druses) attached to dropstones, unionid clams, or their shells.
Their spatial distribution suggests that zebra mussel expansion
onto soft sediments is supplied primarily by nearby hard substrate
areas. Zebra mussel populations living on soft sediment have the
normal size distribution as those found on hard surfaces, often
with a bimodal or trimodal character; representing cohorts of different
ages. At the sites studied, there was a large proportion of dead
shells, suggesting colonization over an extended period, as well
as a relatively high mortality rate due to burial by periodic catastrophic
sedimentation after storms. This vulnerability and the need to be
near to source areas make it unlikely that the zebra mussel (D.
polymorpha) will continue to expand into areas of soft sediment
remote from hard substrate areas. The impact of the zebra mussel
colonies on important textural properties of the substrate was not
dramatic, but median grain diameter was significantly finer; organic
carbon significantly higher; and sediment consistency more clayey
below zebra mussel mats. Metal content was generally higher in the
samples below zebra mussel mats, but the differences were statistically
significant only in the case of iron and maganese. However; the
sediment concentrations of metals at all sites were much greater
than those at the remote Mid-basin site that was barren of zebra
mussels, suggesting an overall metal enrichment near zebra mussel
colonies.
Keywords: Great Lakes, contaminants, exotic species,
benthos
|