| |
|
Freshwater Fish Habitat: Science, Management, and Conservation
in France
Y. Souchon1, P. Keith2
1Cemagref
Laboratoire d'Hydroécologie Quantitative, Unite de
Recherche Biologie des Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, 3 bis,
quai Chauveau, CP 220, 69336 Lyon Cedex 09,
France. E-mail: yves.souchon@cemagref.fr
2Muséum
National d'Histoire Naturelle,IEGB, Service du Patrimoine
Naturel, 57, rue Cuvier 5231 Paris Cedex 05, France
|
Abstract
Characteristics of French water bodies and fish fauna
are described with special reference to physically altered streams.
Recent researches on fish physical habitat have produced new insights
on: models of probability of fish distributions at a watershed scale,
fish ecology, in particular about their habitat preferences, hydraulic
statistical modelling with simplification of data collection, models
of impacts of flow or modifications to stream morphology, ad coupling
physics and biology. These models have been validated at fish population
(trout) or assemblage Rhône river) level.
Other complementary researches are dealing with fluvial
dynamics necessary to maintain habitat or with ecological dynamic
linked to flows and morphology (especially substrate).
For the legal point of view, Fishing law (1984 in FCE
a), Water law (1992 in FCE b), and the last European Water Framework
Directive (2000) defined the limits of hydrosystems utilization.
They defended the principle of an equilibrium between hydrosystems
utilization.
It is also necessary to better link streams and their
watersheds. Waterbodies regionalization will be a good way reduce
the natural variability of physical and biological situations in
order to better manage ecological entities it respect of their sensitivity.
The setting of a national survey of fish communities is fundamental.
National conservation programmes with main protected
areas of France has not been very successful at protecting freshwater
fish. Rehabilitation plans of some emblematic fish species Salmon,
Sturgeon, Eel, Shad have helped to coordinate actions in large heavily
anthropised rivers. In other numerous aquatic systems, it is better
to store the functioning of the first key compartments, hydrology
and morphology. Fish communities are in these cases good measures
of the benefits of rehabilitation actions.
Future research will deal with different interfaces
between physics and biology, in order to better manage channels,
sediments, flows, and riparian vegetation.
Keywords: physical habitat modelling, hydraulic geometry, fish
population, fish assemblage, protected area
|