| |
|
Ecological and ecotoxicological surveys of moderately
contaminated floodplain ecosystems in The Netherlands
J. de Jongea, J.M. Brilsb, A.J. Hendriksa, W.C. Mac
aInstitute
for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment, P0
Box 17, NL-8200 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands
bAquaSense,
PC Box 95125, NL-1090 HG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
cInstitute
for Forestry and Nature Research, P0 Box 23, NL-4700 AA Wageningen,
The Netherlands
|
Abstract
Floodplains of the rivers
Rhine and Meuse in the Netherlands are moderately polluted with
heavy metals and toxic compounds. In these floodplain areas a number
of nature rehabilitation programmes are being planned and executed.
The question arises whether or not the contaminants of concern pose
a risk to organisms exposed, and, if so, whether this will hinder
the expected ecosystem recovery. This study focuses on the effects
of contaminants on aquatic and terrestrial macro-invertebrates in
the field situation. In three shallow lakes in the floodplains of
the river Rhine, showing different degrees of contamination, chemical
analyses and laboratory bioassays have been carried out on sediment
samples together with intensive biological field surveys (a so called
TRIAD-approach). A nearly identical set-up was chosen to assess
18 terrestrial floodplain sites. The concentrations of several contaminants
exceed generic critical risk levels. Risk assessment models show
that actual effects on top predators cannot be excluded. Species
of lower trophic status might be at risk as well. In the aquatic
compartments chemical, ecotoxicological and ecological results point
in the same direction. They can be summarised as moderate biological
effects, which can mainly he attributed to the elevated levels of
a mixture of priority pollutants (metals and polyaromatic hydrocarbons).
No large differences were found among the three lakes. At terrestrial
sites, however, fewer effects were found in field surveys and bioassays,
while the chemical analyses revealed the same levels of pollution
as in the lakes study. This suggests a lower bioavailability of
the contaminants than expected. In conclusion, no extreme effects
have been found. This conclusion only partly supports the predictions
made by present day-risk assessment models. The advantages of nature
rehabilitation, tat is, improvement of ecological quality through
habitat diversity, seem to be larger than the disadvantages of increasing
toxic stress by exposing a larger diversity of species to floodplain
contaminants. To confirm this statement rehabilitation programmes
should include overall as well as in-depth monitoring studies. ©
1999 Elsevier Science Ltd and AEHMS. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Macro-invertebrates;
TRIAD-approach; Bioassays
|